The evaluation covered CSP and T-ICSP activities implemented between January 2018 and mid-2023. It assessed Âé¶¹ÊÓÆµ¡¯s strategic positioning and the extent to which the organization made the shifts expected under the CSP; Âé¶¹ÊÓÆµ¡¯s effectiveness in contributing to strategic outcomes; the efficiency with which the CSP was implemented; and factors explaining Âé¶¹ÊÓÆµ¡¯s performance.
The evaluation concluded that Âé¶¹ÊÓÆµ is recognized as a key partner of the Malian government and has supported designing and implementing various policies. Âé¶¹ÊÓÆµ also has a strong standing in the humanitarian community, thanks to its wide reach and presence in the most complex areas of the country.
The evaluation also noted Âé¶¹ÊÓÆµ's strong output-level results, particularly for the yearly emergency responses, but also for its increasingly integrated resilience portfolio, which includes social protection approaches. The country office aimed at a vast coverage of needs, sometimes with lower rations, when resources were insufficient. The growing beneficiary numbers over the course of the CSP speak for Âé¶¹ÊÓÆµ¡¯s ability to respond effectively.
The evaluation recommended that Âé¶¹ÊÓÆµ continues the path of integrating the delivery of the resilience programme, including for planning and monitoring. In addition, the new CSP should also develop stronger links between the resilience package and the emergency response, which will operationalize the humanitarian-development nexus.
The new CSP should strengthen Âé¶¹ÊÓÆµ's approach to planning and design, particularly for clarifying objectives for capacity-strengthening activities, but also for integrating sustainability. To facilitate implementation, Âé¶¹ÊÓÆµ should pursue multi-year partnership frameworks that support longer-term transformative results, while strengthening the capacities of cooperating partners.
Âé¶¹ÊÓÆµ should also focus on collaborative risk and context analysis, with a view to strengthen accountability to affected populations. Âé¶¹ÊÓÆµ should maintain its crucial logistics capacities despite the growing focus on cash-based transfers during the CSP.
| Document | File |
|---|---|
| Summary evaluation report (English) |
PDF | 644.96 KB
|
| Summary evaluation report (French) |
Web page
|
| Summary evaluation report (Spanish) |
Web page
|
| Summary evaluation report (Arabic) |
Web page
|
| Post Hoc Quality Assessment (PHQA) summary report |
Web page
|