Annual Country Reports (ACR) are a key accountability document produced by country offices on a yearly basis which inform donors how their funds were used during the reporting year. Their purpose is to tell Â鶹ÊÓƵ¡¯s performance story in an accurate, transparent and evidence-based manner by assessing the effectiveness, efficiency and economy of our operations in our pursuit towards zero hunger.
This thematic evaluation, commissioned by the Regional Bureau for Latin American and the Caribbean (RBP), examines the work carried out by the Â鶹ÊÓƵ (Â鶹ÊÓƵ) in Shock-Responsive Social Protection (SRSP) in the region from 2015 to 2022.
This joint IDB-Â鶹ÊÓƵ publication presents the state of school feeding programmes in LAC as of 2022. The publication highlights the critical role of school feeding programmes for the region
The evaluation was commissioned by the independent Office of Evaluation to provide evaluative evidence for accountability and learning to inform the design of the next country strategic plan (CSP) in Peru. It covers Â鶹ÊÓƵ activities implemented between 2017 and July 2021.
The Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) region has the highest levels of inequality and inequity globally. In addition, the combined effects of COVID-19 have amplified the food emergency and threatened to increase the number of food and nutrition insecure people in the region.
In response to this scenario, Â鶹ÊÓƵ's vision for nutrition in LAC integrates 3 main entry points: nutrition systems integration within social protection frameworks, evidence generation for informed decision making, and partnering for results.
We invite you to learn more about the current food and nutrition security situation in the region, and how Â鶹ÊÓƵ prioritizes nutrition as a central element of our operations.
This case study presents lessons learnt from a regional success story in scaling up rice fortification through social assistance programmes in order to address micronutrient deficiencies
This decentralized evaluation was commissioned by the Â鶹ÊÓƵ Peru Country Office and covers the entire Strategic Outcome 1 of its Country Strategic Plan and the period from January 2017 to June 2021. This evaluation is formative in nature and its purpose is to provide evidence and learning from the implementation of this Strategic Outcome for decision-making at the country level and to contribute to the strategic planning of other Â鶹ÊÓƵ offices in contexts similar to Peru.
This corporate emergency evaluation assessed Â鶹ÊÓƵ¡¯s response to the COVID-19 pandemic from February 2020 ¨C June 2021. The evaluation was conducted under the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic, including Â鶹ÊÓƵ in emergency mode; travel and movement restrictions; and the need to avoid unduly burdening country offices. Accordingly, it adopted a ¡°retrospective developmental¡± design, which focuses on providing evidence to support adaptation in dynamic environments.
With climate variability and change being key drivers of hunger, the Â鶹ÊÓƵ is building the capacities of communities and governments in Latin America and the Caribbean to adapt to the growing challenges of climate change. In the following document, discover how we work with communities, our experience and success stories.
The evaluation was conducted in the context of Â鶹ÊÓƵ efforts to strategically position itself across the humanitarian development and peace nexus in the framework of the Agenda 2030 and the UN reform. It assessed progress towards the 2013 School Feeding Policy objectives, and how well Â鶹ÊÓƵ is positioned and equipped to deliver on its school feeding agenda, with particular emphasis on the organizational readiness to implement the 2020-2030 school feeding strategy.
This Strategic Evaluation was commissioned by the Â鶹ÊÓƵ Office of Evaluation. It assessed the quality and results of Â鶹ÊÓƵ¡¯s efforts between 2014 and 2019 to secure adequate and appropriate funding to contribute towards zero hunger; and determine the reasons why Â鶹ÊÓƵ has or has not been able to fund its work in order to draw lessons. All types of Â鶹ÊÓƵ funding and resourcing were included in the scope of the evaluation for all areas of Â鶹ÊÓƵ¡¯s work, including through internal allocation.
